Posted by
Eng. Sidaross on Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:46:43 AM
TO THE CONCERNED PUBLIC
FOR JUSTICE AND REFORM OF JUSTICE SYSTEM
Case no. BC354160 Filed 6/16/06 DFEH Right To Sue
WRONGFUL TERMINATION 2005 AND COURT INJUSTICE SINCE 1994
Plaintiff In Pro Per
38 defendants
The whole system of America should be reformed for Consistency, Preserving Education, Peace, and Justice
NOT BY TALKING - I know the solution and would like to help after winning this matter.
The following 64 pages court complaint is a full complaint of the latest version of the lawsuit Case #BC354160. This complaint is thrown by the judge of this matter without opportunity to Plaintiff to be heard or the violation be exposed to the public for justice reason to Plaintiff and protection to all the public since it is public concern as well.
Defendants on the caption should not be dropped or taken off, and the caption shall not be altered as prior judges and Supreme Court did (See first postings dated 3,9, 2007, below this complaint). Those defendants either individuals or state agencies and courts are the key of all harm happened and will happen to Plaintiff and others in the community. I had no enemy all my life. After involving with the Union, Court, judges and attorneys, I was objected to all harm and crime in the world (with my respect to the good judges and attorneys - but where are they? They have to show themselves who are they and proof the honesty by action NOT by talking or writing, otherwise, no blame or opposition or retaliation against Plaintiff of this matter should occur from the legal system as a whole). Judge got fired or retired due to his violation but the compensation to Plaintiff upon Appeal court ruling has never been awarded since 1997. A lot of issues are involved in this research matter, but not all issues are posted here yet. It is mainly Employer/Union conspiracy and sneaky act against the public interest with support of judges' SIGNATURE AND IMMUNITY to strike the real life incidents and crime whenever judges wish while all of them are gaining power with taxpayers' money!!! Are they Gods or Are we stupid here?
HISTORY AND HARM IN SHORT:
A Judge supported sexual harassment, threw the case instantly, and insulted my female attorney inside the court for defending her client while she was patient with me; Appeal court ruled to reverse judge decision and compensate Plaintiff in 1997 but Judge Ross disregarded and disobeyed the appeal ruling, and threw the matter again 1997. Judgment was misunderstood among the community as "Sexual harassment is ok" while judges are careless believing their rules are hidden inside a room with 4 walls. Judge caused more harm to women engineers so that we cannot complain any more since no court would rule for justice. It is obvious that women engineers' rights and dignity are violated by the courts NOT by the public individuals in male dominated field.
After Plaintiff complained to Appeal court by Judge Edward Ross' violations and the injustice, judge Ross was terminated immediately on or about the year 1999, but the court retired him instead firing him in order to preserve his salary (This privilege is barred from a woman engineer who served the country better). To rule on one side and ignore compensating the victim is a crime and violation to the constitution. Justice was not accomplished since Plaintiff did not get compensated as ruled for by Appeal court while the judge disobeyed the higher ruling. Women/men In Pro Per are still harassed inside courtrooms and reports of court reporters are switched or altered with no justice while judges do not allow personal tape recorders. What is the benefit of Appeal Court if the ruling does not get enforced after plaintiff incurred high legal cost for the appeal and twice for same lawsuit?? Who will pay this money? It is not gone by SIGNATURE OF A JUDGE!! This is so stupid and brainwash, are we dumb here??? They have to pay for their rulings. Judge Ross is sued in this curent lawsuit to be questioned of his violation and Plaintiff is requesting her compensation of 3 years of termination while the violating supervisor woman engineer who terminated Plaintiff because I did not go with her on weekends still working; this is a total mess in the court, therefore, there is no statue of limitation considered for theft and breaching the Constitution. Therefore this court has to be reformed.
"EMPLOYER- UNION" CONSPIRACY AND MALPRACTICE:
Employer lied in suspension documents persistently and harassed Plaintiff and set her up in many situations since 1998 and caused termination by force to Plaintiff in 2005; Adm. judges supported the Union PECG against employee's right after collecting our money; Union hide expenses of our dues and refused to proof it when Plaintiff asked for the itemization when Plaintiff was President Elect in 2002-2003; Union supported Board of engineers in collecting unreasonable fees from engineers to share it together; but no body knows what is the secret behind it as Plaintiff does after attending quarterly meeting and exams; Board mangles with enginering license exams and passes people by names; dishonest engineering decision by management of Caltrans for political reason that harm the community as a whole, when Plaintiff opposed it to protect the public, I got retaliated against for whistle blower reason. Plaintiff opposed the fact in a Union Executive meeting claiming that the B of E. is abusing its role without protection to the country while bridges and structures are broken; union is run by employer management and supervisors which is conflict of interest and are using our dues for their benefit. Plaintiff used to complain to superiors about work problem through e-mail system and cc: to personnel office and EEO who acted to protect my right by using the system as is, so management retaliated and accused Plaintiff by misusing the e-mail system to contact EEO and personnel office and received a suspension, but EEO was not able to protect Plaintiff right, but further the good EEO manager was replaced by another EEO manager who cooperated with management requests to harass plaintiff by lying and conspiracy and harm. Plaintiff requested that EEO system should improve because it causes retaliation of management to employees later, so Plaintiff received suspension of criticizing EEO system ... and so on hundreds of crazy issues as such documented thru the years..... then, Union and judges insulted plaintiff on employer state computer in public on e-mails sent to all management and colleagues statewide, Why they were not reported of misusing the State e-mail system?
THREAT OF LIFE E-MAIL:
Plaintiff was elected as President Elect in 2002-04 and found that I was the first state employee woman engineer to be elected president elect of the Union in 30 years history of the Union PECG. Union prevented Plaintiff President elect to talk to the memberships about any issue of internal Union decision and operation and the usage of the dues, sent a threat of life e-mail to Plaintiff that the Union will sue her and put her in prison if she does not stop and that I will write my e-mails from a jail cell; Union recalled President Elect immediately inside closed door without Memberships approval until now, presented letter of resignation that was rejected by the Plaintiff inside closed door so they theatened by a big defamation which they did, made new rules on the spot and maneuvered constitution and bylaws as they wish with help of judges and few legislatures friends of Union officers against the public and memberships' right, caused suspension of 3 months to Plaintiff during Presidency installation to cause defamation statewide; bolts of my chair were taken off in my office in the State workplace to cause me harm, which I reported it to the security... I filed lawsuit in 2003 about the threat of life e-mail by the Union/ SPB for protection and safety of life reason since I was scarred and could not live well and wanted to document issues and to protect my presidency by filing injunction, unfortunately the judge supported the threat of life to a woman engineer, but he is sued in this current lawsuit along with the union officers for justice reason and overturn the false ruling against Plaintiff who has been objected to crime every day. It is obvious that all of them shared the same benefit.
LEGAL SYSTEMM VIOLATIONS:
Attorney Knickerbocker charged legal fees of $7000 ONLY to file suspensions to protect Plaintiff job, but unfortunately he took the money and disappeared and never filed the matter and caused termination to Plaintiff and supported Caltrans employer in its retaliation; how should we trust attorneys and pay them money any more??? Other attorneys charged the legal fees but never addressed client's concern but it is just games inside the court resulting only in injustice; I lost more than $300,000 of my saving and family money to deal with corruption of court system alone, for one legal matter in 2003-04. Now I have no resources, so I have to go In Pro Per to discover that the constitution and the law has absolutely no system for In pro per, it is misleading and cheating the public while judges put In Pro Per in the prison or the jail when defending themselves. During reporting lack of court system and abuse to the economy, my judge shut me up and told me not to put issues on record. Then started to get a sheriff especially for me in the court planning to harm me, so I reported the issue for protection reason to higher judges and recused the judge before she actually harm me. If any kidnapping or harm to me those judges and attorneys on the list shall be questioned and are liable with no immunity to abuse the Humanity any more. This became total crime and abuse to freedom of speech for peace and social change... no violence or wrong act occurred by me but only frustration or crying sometime which is not violence, so what was the reason that the judge threaten me by sheriffs???
CRIME AND FALSE RULING TO BE ALTERED:
My address was altered on State computer to set me up and collect my money in fines, caused the IRS to act in fraud against woman engineer business and send letters garnishing my wages from companies all around while I was out of work and not working, it was just defamation and messing up my record which the Union and judges are liable to pay for it since they have the power to harass people, they should have the power to pay as well for it. Do we have to live with this mess around instead of serving the country? I studied all my life and gained higher education and experience to serve the community NOT to get killed in the Free Country by Judges and Union with my money, while the public does not know the corruption that is hidden and thrown in the trash and in court storage away from the public and issue false precedent that would be applied on other victims later.... They attempted to create false bad record for me to set me up since they could not find a mistake for me, they owe me overtime for few years never paid just for retaliation as if women do not deserve to get paid for their effort while my work was credited to colleagues and supervisors who were out all day with their family or shopping then they come and take my work and go to the meeting with my work while the woman engineer stay in the office like stupid working for free. I will not play this game and women engineers should be respected. I have excellent record, education, and experience, and my engineering license is more credible and higher than PE California engineering license that is purchased by thousands of dollars not by merit.
My computer was stolen from my business storage after 13 years of my business, with no problem or theft; sheriffs were sent after me on the road to put false parking tickets twice a week until the public noticed and warned me of sheriff following me and putting false tickets on my car and confronted the sheriff of why should he put false ticket on my car!!!! This is top crime.. Is this the freedom and right of women in the free country? Human rights is violated in the American society by the legal system itself. Caltrans legal office sent e-mails to my witnesses colleagues threatening them if they witness for me they will not get their salary of that day or get fired, they used me as an example to shut up others from questioning the Union or the system.
Strangers are sent to private residence to harm me many times while the police involved. This occurred after Judge Stoll denied the injunction and supported the threat of life e-mail and dismiss defendants Union officers in violation for the Union matter of 2003, but further made court order on Plaintiff to pay the violators legal fees.... Is this the court or justice in America??? Then crime occurred again when Judge Helen dismissed Union and caltrans again last few months in September and October 2007 while Plaintiff In Pro Per was hospitalized and under medical treatment. These comments and release of violation are for constructive criticism and for achieving the justice through awareness to people in order to restore the Great Country reputation and Power back NOT for otherwise reason.
I am in danger at this time and I am posting all these for your information because many colleagues got killed at their homes already as I was told without notifying the public of the true situation and problem and there is no record or court filing, then the police had no way to find out the real crime and claimed that they suicide at home, which is not true, or they it is just accident on the freeway by government trucks as it occurred to me in Sacramento in 2001, I died for an hour and before the ambulance took me to the hospital from the freeway, God woke me up to see the whole movie while my car was totaled and I was inside and the police was taking a report.... It was not my day yet. God is great and more powerful that all these games in the court and politics around. Just trust God, be honest, and courage, support others in a trouble so that God bless you and send you someone to save you when you need it, that is the community is about. If you want benefit of the society you have to share and participate honestly without fear of anything. Together we win, separate we fail.
I am notifying all of you for protection reason while I am alive NOT after I die so you cannot get information of the truth from me. This court system has to be closed and reformed. I do not have intention to die or suicide, only when God wants. I would like or hope to turn America's system around for justice and peace before I die. It is double standard in the law and court process, no system for In Pro Per to proceed in litigation if you do not have money or if you do not trust attorneys representation to you. I am asking for establishing a system for In Pro Per.
CONTACT ME:
Feel free to contact me at my e-mail
sidarossms@aol.com but please mention this posting on the subject of your e-mail.
I expect the courtesy and care in the reply. Please present your education and occupation and name. No reply or consideration to issues in e-mails with no names or disrespectful. All issues reported are honest and true 100% with proof and documentation sent around the world for safety reason and protection to documents since trial to kill me was persistent since 2001 until now, while the police involved as well in protecting me so far, while I was not aware of their protection. I appreciate the police protection to my life until now.
This matter shall not die and I want my compensation that I deserve from each defendant in the caption including the courts and state bar and board of engineers and individuals and attorneys and mainly Caltrans. NO judge or any prejudices or retaliation shall decide for me. This is my job and career and money, I am the only one who decides for my life and compensation, I am the only one who suffered from corruption that no one tried to solve it. I further try to inform the public and serve honestly to reform the whole system for best interest of the public on my effort and money and time through the Ph.D. research. I should get paid for it. I am going to the court to present the violation and request signature for my compensation to overturn the defamation occurred. I am not asking the judge or the court if I am right of wrong, or if I have right or not!!! I am not a kid and do not need a judge to tell an engineer what to do or how to think. After getting my right, I be able to work for overturning this hassle for benefit of every body including attorneys and judges, no one will be harmed or lose jobs but we need justice not corruption around. No one will take money after one dies, so there is no reason to fight and thief each other or cause hardship to each other around and cause crime to women, or homelessness to human being while every body is just watching and playing games in the court, this is not jobs or duty of judges and legislatures.
CALL FOR LEGAL ADVICE and HUMAN RIGHTS SUPPORT:
Plaintiff refuses and absolutely declines that Caltrans and the State call the matter: .......... vs. "THE PEOPLE of the State of California".
My reply is: THE PEOPLE elected and trusted Plaintiff as the Union President to protect their rights and I am still at my word; THE PEOPLE are suffering of the corruption that Plaintiff is trying to solve for the benefit of THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff saved THE PEOPLE from disaster of engineering decision of management and wrong bridge design at Catrans and lost her job to defend THE PEOPLE's rights honestly without any benefit so far. Defendants on the caption are the ones who caused harm to Plaintiff and the society and wasted taxpayers' money and abused a woman engineer career and service to the community, but even though, Plaintiff does not have any bad intention and wish no harm to any one of them, but Plaintiff will not leave her right and compensation for justice, humanity, dignity, and professional reason of a woman engineer.
Plaitiff is posting the whole matter here for documentation purpose for her rights since the court is hiding all the complaint and dismissing defendants as well before any trial for the third time. Plaintiff is also calling for Human Rights Attorney and Civil Rights Attorney and Criminal matters Attorneys to involve and help Plaintiff with this big issue for justice reason and social change. Plaintiff does not wish to harm any one of the defendants but wish to get her rights and teach every one to stop this mess, stop harassing women engineers, and stop the injustice.
HARASSING TRIAL IN CLOSED DOOR WITH NO WITNESS:
In Nov 2004 Judge Stoll cancelled the jury and kept Plaintiff alone in the court with no witness or media. Though this is illegal and against the constitution but he did it any way violating the civil right of Plaintiff, then dismiss defendants and ruled falsely against Plaintiff and causing monitory judgment as well for the Union!!!! It is crazy acts and Plaintiff shall not experience or tolerate this terrible violation any more by court injustice or misuse of power. J. Stoll and Attorney Chaitin ex attorney for Plaintiff shall pay for their harassment to Plaintiff. If judge Helen Bendix plans to dismiss them for immunity reason, so she and the immunity will be liable for all this violation.
INEQUALITY FOR IN PRO PER:
Plaintiff In Pro Per is not assigned attorney or given any legal advice while attorneys were assigned to all defendants. No equality or justice; it is harassment and invalid court process. No system in the court and the law for In Pro Per. If NO attorney will help plaintiff as requested, therefore, Plaintiff is requesting from the superior court to adopt a new system for this Plaintiff and this matter and then to be applied for the public later once it is tried in this matter. Plaintiff wants to present her matter on the media and requests her compensation and be rewarded for the defamation and damaging her career and for the suffering for years while negatively affected her excellent health. At this time the judge is disqualified and sued as of February 29, 2008 for discrimination and humiliating Plaintiff In Pro Per and her visitors and the media in Public inside the court and mangling with Plaintiff health and matter and trying to dismiss the matter without opportunity for Plaintiff to be heard or compensated for the harm occurred. They call this: a court system. Plaintiff posts the whole complaint as is for public information and justice.
I apologize for the lengthy details, though it is incomplete too, but you need to learn these issues in order to understand the Complaint and my frustration. This posting is not edited for shortage of time, please forgive any typo or grammar mistakes or unclear statements. Please let me know if you do not understand any meaning and I will be happy to clarify it .
Thank you for your time and support in order to achieve the justice and reform the legal system and the whole structure at once.
With best regard and wishes,
Eng. Monique Sidaross, SG.UCC, DDG, FABI, AdVSci
Minister of Culture
Ambassador General
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Monique S. Sidaross, Engineer
MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, Engineer
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
P.O. Box 6705
Rosemead, CA 91770
(626) 309-2998
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, as an individual, State employee, In Pro Per,
Plaintiff,
vs.
State of California, a governmental entity; California Department of Transportation, a California Government Agency; individuals directly caused wrongful termination: Art Salazar, Art Duffy, Paula Durham, Steve Nakao, Tom Rut, Gedion Werrede, Barton Newton, Shannon Post, Phil Lutz, Jim Calkins, Mohammad Hadi Behrooj, Mohammad Ali Molla, Safwat Salahieh, Kamal Abdul Karim, Gay Norris, Bob McNew, Marian Woo, Steve Takigawa, Lydia Lewis, SPB board members, ALJ Bretcher, ALJ Segal, ALJ Brown, Judge Ross, Judge Stoll, Richard Knickerbocker, Leonard Chaitin, Wayne Dryden; Second Appellate Court of State of Calif.; Supreme Court of Calif.; State Bar of Calif.; Board of Engineers of Calif., Cindi Christenson; Jerry Montoya & Caltrans Legal Division; and Does 1-50,
A SEAL: For safety of life reason, this caption shall not be altered or changed as judge Stoll, appeal & supreme courts did and put Plaintiff life in danger. Only Plaintiff decides whom to sue for that reason. Dismissal system is defendants’ opportunity to escape, and shall cause life threat or assassination to plaintiff as occurred several times before, and on 11/29/07 after the hearing of Nov 28, 2007 when judge dismiss-ed defendants. A Complex Matter with ONE Plaintiff In Pro Per is very frustrating, scary & needs attention and justice of judge Helen. Plaintiff apologizes to Hon. J. Helen for any frustration or misunderstanding occurred due to being In Pro Per & facing threat of life by union/judges.
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
CASE No.: BC354160
DAMAGES & COURT INJUSTICE
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
AMENDMENT TO “New SAC”
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR GENERAL AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES:
1. Gender Discrimination;
2. Sexual Harassment;
3. Hostile Work Environment;
4. Defamation;
5. False Imprisonment;
6. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress;
7. Invasion of Privacy;
8. Religious Discrimination;
9. Quantum Meruit;
10. Breach of Written Contract;
11. Breach of Oral Contract;
12. Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing;
13. Fraud – Concealment;
14. Fraud – Misrepresentation;
15. Negligence;
16. Unfair Business Practices;
17. Wrongful Termination; and
18. Abuse of discretion, power, and immunity
19. Breach of constitution & First Amendment
JUDGE : Hon. Helen I. Bendix
ACTION FILED : June 16, 2006
TRIAL DATE : June 18, 2008
TIME : 9:30 a.m.
Served : Februay 11, 2008
HEARING DATE: March 28, 2008
TIME : 8:30 a.m.
DEPT : 18
|
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, and alleges a COMPLEX MATTER as follows:
1. Plaintiff, MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, is an individual and is now, and at all times mentioned herein, residing in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.
2. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges that Defendant California Department of Transportation, DOT, DPA, hereinafter referred to as CALTRANS, is
SEE FULL COMPLAINT ABOVE....