Posted by
Eng. Sidaross on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:55:41 AM
REGARDING DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE HELEN
AND REQUEST OF NEW JUDGE
>>>>> J. Helen is placed with defendants at this time and is not allowed to hold
any hearing or talk to my defendants starting Feb 29, 2008, all her rulings
are NULL and anti constitution <<<<<
This matter shall not be litigated until the system gets adjusted to accommodate In Pro Per Status. For history
reason, the starting date of this matter, 6/16/06 has been extended to November 2, 2007 due to continuous
conspiracy, harassment, and retaliation of employer through Caltrans Legal Division. Illegality and crime
towards Plaintiff shall not be dismissed because opinion of a judge (judges’ opinion is at home), or due to
misuse of immunity, or favoritism among all legal system. Women’s career, lives, and safety of life are not for
judges to harass or kill.
J. Helen mishandled the matter and caused unnecessary delay with nonsense process and judicial malpractice
and discrimination for her own purpose and support to defendants. Plaintiff, In Pro Per, woman engineer is not
stupid or slave for the court and judges.
Judge Helen is biased; prejudiced; intemperance; yelling; undermining Plaintiff and priests visitors in public in
the court; mangling with attorneys of defendants Caltrans; insulting plaintiff in court minutes in Christmas Time; harming Plaintiff health; causing run around and tricks; caused unreasonable costs and waste of time to Plaintiff
while has no income; contacted defendants and conducted hearings without consent of Plaintiff and in absence
of Plaintiff while hospitalized and under medical treatment for more than 2 months due to permanent work
injury, singled out In Pro Per Plaintiff by calling a sheriff to harass or intimidate Plaintiff inside the court and
causes defamation in public, unfair and obvious inequality and prejudice in the court process, crime increased
at plaintiff residence during J. Helen mishandling the matter, though Plaintiff notified all parties, for future
documentation, and hoped J. Helen corrects her mistakes, but unfortunately, she persisted and willfully ignored
all requests and civil rights of In Pro Per, accepted nonsense pleadings from defendants, wasting taxpayers’
money, causing unnecessary debt to Plaintiff in addition to prior losses claimed in this matter, and caused
delay and waste time for more than a year. Therefore, all J. Helen rulings are null, invalid, and shall be set aside
and thrown away and are not existed, especially since 6/07; reporter’s transcript is false, illegal, missing In Pro
Per reply and is a proof of illegality where Judge meet defendants for 3 months without consent of Plaintiff while hospitalized!!!!!!
People should go to court to get the justice, NOT to get the run around show between judges and
attorneys and Union. In Pro Pers should not study law for free with nonsense writings because of lack of system in the constitution; we have our own career that serves the country better. Legal advice, due dates, and flexible process, should be considered in such complex matter and given to In Pro Per. This lawsuit was brought up due to defendants’ attacks to Plaintiff on State Computer with slandering, disparaging statements and defamation, insult, threat of life e-mails, conspiracy, discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation since 1994, then Judges conspiracy under influence of union and false immunity, and misusing their immunity to cover up on the crime and illegality mentioned above; alter the legal matter and create false precedents as Judge Stoll did, then Judge Helen dismissed these crimes again, what is her benefit behind it; due to these facts, all ruling are illegal and invalid since she has committed bias, violation against Plaintiff. This is a crime to the humanity, falsifying history of the law, and building false-minded future generation.
Plaintiff does not believe in Jury system and do not accept decision of the Jury or the judge. They do not
decide for engineers’ career and income. The decision is only mine because this is my career and life and
money. A media forum is the replacement for a jury to present the case to the public without restriction and
hiding and sneaky system. especially if some individuals are prejudice against women, and judge sneaks with defendants for personal reason and to cover up on crime. I only present the facts and harassment done to me
at work and threat of life, asking the court to award me my losses & retirement in a lawsuit forum; that is it. It
should not take years and nonsense games.
REQUEST:
1. Legal advice offer to Plaintiff In Pro per, equal to defendants.
2. CMC meeting where I can be heard for all my concerns, time and guidance to prepare
3. Extension of trial. Help for investigation and presentation, considering the new date for the matter as of Feb 6, 2008, the retaliation and threat of life.
4. Plaintiff does not feel safe in the court alone. The court to arrange for a media, while Plaintiff will bring own tape recorder in each hearing.
5. Caltrans and the State as defendants DO NOT represent “THE PEOPLE” against Plaintiff. Those PEOPLE elected me as Union President to defend their right against corruption. I refuse using such terminology in my matter. It is not a system or decision of a judge. This is my matter; it belongs to my name.
6. I am NOT an enemy to the court/ judges/ attorneys due to asking for justice from their illegal acts by some of them; and by the Employer, the State, but NOT the Governor.
7. Serving documents by fax & mail by Plaintiff, and acceptance of Lexus Nexus system
8. Since investigators refuse to deal with In Pro Per, and seek attorneys on record, therefore, the constitu-
tion is lacking In Pro Per system and the public is misinformed and cheated. So J. Helen has violated my
civil rights during hospitalization, and all her rulings are invalid since June 2007 and shall be set aside and striked from record.
9. On the other hand, some attorneys are dishonest to clients or women, took my money as Mr. Knickerbo-
cker $7000 and disappeared and caused me loss of my job as well. But the court and state bar support attorneys in stealing money of clients as we can see. Defendants never submitted any mail to defendant knickerbockers, so all their mails are null and invalid. I have my valid reason not to use attorneys’ service due to cheating and nonsense system; we should not pay for it until gets adjusted. But, J. Helen supports the corruption and theft and denial of Plaintiff compensation form each defendant who committed violation. Plaintiff is not slave here; every one will carry his/her own decision. The constitution and the court shall
be reformed before my case is decided for.
10. The matter shall be reconsidered, since June 30, 2007 with the operative complaint called “NewSAC”
with no striking of any issues or causes of actions,
11. Plaintiff claims all losses occurred due to sneaky way of defendants and misusing the system of demur-
ring to abuse Plaintiff In Pro Per and wasting taxpayers’ money while J. Helen supported them. During
the period of Jan to May 2007, and July 2007 to February 2008, and until reinstating the matter in clean
status, in addition to the original losses of the wrongful termination, hoping this hassle shall not occur
again.
12. Plaintiff does not play brainwash with striking real life violation on paper, this is crazy, and kind of
shoveling crime under the rug, protecting right of criminals than safeguard rights of citizens to be free of
crimes at homes an on the streets as is being happening and observed with Plaintiff from J. Stoll and J.
Helen.
13. If they are scarred now from being litigated in the court of law from their wicked acts, so they are aware
that what they did was illegal; why they did illegal acts while all judges and attorneys are under oath from
first day of their career? This is double violation claimed against all judicial officers in this matter because
they misrepresented the country and projected false example to attorneys under judges’ influence and
intimidation of power. It is willful disrespect to woman engineer, believing women are helpless and
scared!!! Are women engineers stupid here?
14. In addition to prior accusations, Plaintiff claims that Judge Helen and those judges on the caption in all
levels of the courts, lower and higher courts, have breached the constitution of America in all its parts,
and is asking Hon. J. Czuleger, Hon. J. McCoy, Governor Schwarzenegger, and our President W. Bush
to take serious action to protect Plaintiff life and career and income, and help in successfully litigate this
matter for justice reason for Plaintiff, and for establishing a social change in the Court system for future America.
15. Plaintiff has taken the initiative and started a research in Doctoral Studies to investigate and put together
a hint for new Constitution in this regard. But a crime is persistent to harm Plaintiff before accomplishing
this goal for future America and the world. The result is not against judges or lawyers but to create a new system to follow.
16. These are just samples, many other issues need to be addressed in CMC meeting with a judge for enforcement. Since the matter includes dispute of the court injustice and lack of In Pro Per system,
therefore, no system that may cause unfair trial, shall be applied on Plaintiff system
17. I do not believe in Jury system. I need a media set up because I am international officer and the matter
related to the whole society and community of engineers. No jury or judge will decide for my career,
income, and losses, as an engineer. No Jury instruction shall be given or enforced by the judge without
Plaintiff consent and Media involvement.
18. The court is unsafe place for Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall not attend alone in closed room any more without media. No hearings or process shall be held without Plaintiff consent & accommodation to my safety
and respect, and I be heard without striking facts of life. The court system is kind of brainless. No tricks
in my back by judge and sheriffs in court
FEAR AND HATE IN COURTROOM:
My decision became final due to the fact that judge Helen severely mishandled my legal matter with sneaky actions, hate, lies, harm, falsifying my records, harassment by sheriffs, religion discrimination, willfully humiliating Plaintiff in public, and fabrication of documents; all that has caused me to contact Your Honors ahead of time during last few months to aware Your Honors with upcoming future conflict and possible request
of recusing the judge. It was a form of complaint, which is now a real complaint, and a request to save my legal matter and my retirement.
I have a fear from her to the degree that I did not attend the court in person twice; instead, I used court
call system. I am scarred from her and do not wish to be in the emergency room again. She caused me health problems and did not pay me the costs; I have no insurance or income to pay the medical bills and emergency ambulance at this time. I had never been admitted in emergency rooms all my life and no one hated me before, I
am strong and healthy but judge Helen’s attacks in the court in public and mishandling my legal matter again favoring to judges had a negative impact on me…. my matter is my career, income, food, future retirement, and recovering worldwide defamation that has been caused to me by the State Employer Caltrans / Union conspiracy, retaliation, and threat of life.
Crime should not win for monitory reason and favoritism behind the scene.
I need to be heard with respect and seriousness in the court, I do not accept the run around and be
treated with stupidity, and need to discuss issues of concern with a new Judge about problems that should be avoided. All I need is my losses since 1994 in order to end this problem and go on with my life. Each of 37 defendant should be handled separately especially judges who are defendants on the caption, and they are the
main cause of all the problems occurred to Plaintiff myself since 1994. Each defendant committed
violence and defamation that are linked to other defendants with retaliation and conspiracy against Plaintiff, myself.
Since this is my claim, defendants cannot bring accusation out of Plaintiff complaint, they only answer
my accusation. I am asking the court to compensate me for my service and retirement, for the worldwide
defamation caused to me by the Union/ employer misconduct and retaliation, and the problems caused by judges throughout the process since 1994. Judge shall not decide unless issues are clearly addressed with Plaintiff.
Hoping for your cooperation in solving this problem though I was told that Your Honors’ office does
not recuse the judge, but I am asking the court NOT individual office, the constitution lacks system for In Pro
Per, and judges mistreat us; I have to be told what is the system. In making motions prepared by legal personnel but presented by In Pro Per, judges deny all requests for In Pro Per, so it is waste of time and discrimination, and the judge is liable personally of her acts. Why should I waste my time again? I had it enough from J. Helen
I apologize for taking so much time from your valuable time but I keep the trust in Your Honors in protecting my civil rights and my safety of life.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
With all respect and admiration, I remain,
Sincerely,
Eng. Monique S. Sidaross,
Cc: Governor Schwarzenegger
World Forum & Ambassadors worldwide
Dated: Feb. 29, 2008