Posted by
Eng. Sidaross on Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:38:25 AM
From the desk of:
Hon. Eng. Monique S. Sidaross May 15, 2008
With authority of:
Ambassador General, A.G.E.
Minister of Culture
Secretary General UCC
ANNOUNCES:
PRESS RELEASE
FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE REASON
ACTION REQUESTED
HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES AND LAWMAKERS TO CONTACT ME, PLEASE
FRAUD IN COURT DOCUMENTS AND MAIL
>>> JUDGE & DEFENDANTS MAKE COURTS ALONE WITHOUT CONSENT OF PLAINTIFF!! <<<
CASE # BC354160 SUPERIOR COURT LOS ANGELES D18, JUDGE RECUSED FOR DISCRIMINATION. TRIAL 6/18/08 SHALL BE POSTPONED
IT IS A FELONY IF HANDLED WITHOUT PLAINTIFF CONSENT.
NO TRIAL ALLOWED, NO JURY ALLOWED, JUDGE HELEN BENDIX IS ACCUSED BY VEXATIOUS ACTS AND BREACHING THE CONSTITUTION IF ACTED OR RULED IN ABSENCE OF PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT PLAINTIFF CONSENT.
HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES AND LAWMAKERS TO REPLY AND CONDUCT MEETINGS IN PUBLIC FOR PLAINTIFF TO BE HEARD.
ALL COURT RECORDS AND MAILS ARE LIES AND FALSIFIED - THIS IS FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION AND QUESTIONING SNEAKY ACT BY THE COURT IN EVERY STEP OF THE MATTER, WHILE MANGLING WITH IN PRO PER. THIS MATTER IS COMPLEX AND UNIQUE: ALL ATTORNEYS FEAR TO REPRESENT THIS PLAINTIFF DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF REPORTING INJUSTICE IN COURT & BY JUDGES. PLAINTIFF IS IN PRO PER WITH NO SYSTEM IN THE LAW. THIS KIND OF LEGAL MATTER DOES NOT EXIST IN THE LAW, SHALL BE HANDLED WITH SPECIAL WAY AFTER MEETING WITH HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES AND GOVERNOR.
APPEAL AND SUPREME COURTS ARE DEFENDANTS, ARE NOT ALLOWED TO RULE OR CONDUCT APPEAL DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST, DISQUALIFICATION AND RETALIATION REASON. LAWMAKERS AND HOUSE REPRESENTATIVES TO REPLY FOR PROTECTION AND BEST HANDLING THE MATTER. PLAINTIFF HAS NOT BEEN HEARD AT ALL.
IF ANY ONE OF THE PUBLIC OR ANY JUDGE LISTENS AND TRUST OR SUPPORT JUDGE HELEN WITHOUT INPUT OF PLAINTIFF, ONE SHALL BE QUESTIONED & ACCUSED OF CONSPIRACY.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTES:
The following filing is for public information and for any arrangement of Jury without knowledge of Plaintiff. Plaintiff does not beleive in Jury system, plaintiff requests presenting allegations on the media, AFTER Lawmakers and House Representatives address issues and court abuse with Plaintiff, before court proceeding may go through in this matter. It would be Felony on all legal personnel and judges and any individual who cooperate under duress or bribing or whatever agaisnt Plaintiff best interest and the justice.
MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, Engineer
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
P.O. Box 6705
Rosemead, CA 91770
(626) 309-2998
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, Eng., as an individual, State employee, In Pro Per,
Plaintiff,
vs.
State of California, a governmental entity; California Department of Transportation, a California Government Agency; individuals directly caused wrongful termination: Art Salazar, Art Duffy, Paula Durham, Steve Nakao, Tom Rut, Gedion Werrede, Barton Newton, Shannon Post, Phil Lutz, Jim Calkins, Hadi Behrooj, Mohammad Ali Molla, Safwat Salahieh, Kamal Abdul Karim, Gay Norris, Bob McNew, Marian Woo, Steve Takigawa, Lydia Lewis, SPB board members, ALJ Bretcher, ALJ Segal, ALJ Brown, Judge Ross, Judge Stoll, Richard Knickerbocker, Leonard Chaitin, Wayne Dryden; Second Appellate Court of State of Calif.; Supreme Court of Calif.; State Bar of Calif.; Board of Engineers of Calif.; Cindi Christenson; Jerry Montoya-Caltrans Legal Div. (11/2/07); J. Helen Bendix (2/29/08); Nena Vuong (3/23/08); and Does 1-50,
Defendants.
A SEAL: For safety of life reason, this caption shall not be altered or changed as judge Stoll, appeal & supreme courts did and put Plaintiff life in danger. Only Plaintiff decides whom to sue for that reason. Dismissal system is defendants’ opportunity to escape, and shall cause life threat or assassination to plaintiff as occurred several times before, and on 11/29/07 after the hearing of Nov 28, 2007 when judge dismissed defendants. Feb 6, 2008 another attempt of attack directly at the door of Plaintiff residence. A Complex Matter with ONE Plaintiff In Pro Per is very frustrating, needs attention and justice of the court.
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Case No.: No. BC354160
DAMAGES & COURT INJUSTICE
CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
OF 6/18/08
AND MOVE OUT OF DEPT 18
STOP HEARINGS AND TRIAL IN D18 IMMEDIATELY, OTHERWISE FELONY, CHARGE OF ABUSE, AND VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTION WOULD BE FILED VS. ALL DEFENDANTS ON THE CAPTION.
JUDGE ..(Def)….: Hon Judge Helen Bendix ACTION FILED : June 16, 2006
TRIAL DATE : June 18, 2008 to vacate &move
TIME : 9:30 a.m. to vacate &move
HEARING DATE: reply by mail
|
TO ALL PARTIES, 39 DEFENDANTS, AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff (PL) is hereby notifying all parties and the court D18 and D1 of the urgent need to postpone the trial to open time until Lawmakers and House Representatives reply and meet with Plaintiff regarding corruption of court system, self representatives, and litigation process. All hearing and trials are illegal and Plaintiff shall not appear for safety reason.
This matter is public concern and shall be presented in full to the media for the public to read, ask questions, and reply to issues. NO Jury allowed in closed courtroom for safety and justice reason for Plaintiff In Pro per due to prior court harassment, abuse & discrimination that have not been resolved to satisfaction of Plaintiff, and to ensure justice and fair trial. The media & the public are the jury and a new judge is the ruling party.
If otherwise ruling or court order from any judge or court, it would be Felony, breach of constitution, and sanction shall be applied with interest if not paid immediately by the court. All process shall stop since Feb 2008 when judge reported with discrimination and hostile environment in court.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
DATED: May 18, 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTES:
The following filing is to document the mangling of courts in the mail, no dates on the mail for future lies and abuse to the court process. Also Plaintiff returns mails recieved from Caltrans Legal Division that keeps doing meetings and hearings with Defendant Judge accused by discrimination against Plaintiff. Plaintiff is not slave to the judges or to immunity, and shall be treated with respect and justice in courts. Please read some details to understand the accusation. You can ask question but with respect.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
MONIQUE S. SIDAROSS, Eng., as an individual, State employee, In Pro Per,
Plaintiff,
vs.
State of California, a governmental entity; California Department of Transportation, a California Government Agency; individuals directly caused wrongful termination: Art Salazar, Art Duffy, Paula Durham, Steve Nakao, Tom Rut, Gedion Werrede, Barton Newton, Shannon Post, Phil Lutz, Jim Calkins, Hadi Behrooj, Mohammad Ali Molla, Safwat Salahieh, Kamal Abdul Karim, Gay Norris, Bob McNew, Marian Woo, Steve Takigawa, Lydia Lewis, SPB board members, ALJ Bretcher, ALJ Segal, ALJ Brown, Judge Ross, Judge Stoll, Richard Knickerbocker, Leonard Chaitin, Wayne Dryden; Second Appellate Court of State of Calif.; Supreme Court of Calif.; State Bar of Calif.; Board of Engineers of Calif.; Cindi Christenson; Jerry Montoya-Caltrans Legal Div. (11/2/07); J. Helen Bendix (2/29/08); Nena Vuong (3/23/08); and Does 1-50,
Defendants.
A SEAL: For safety of life reason, this caption shall not be altered or changed as judge Stoll, appeal & supreme courts did and put Plaintiff life in danger. Only Plaintiff decides whom to sue for that reason. Dismissal system is defendants’ opportunity to escape, and shall cause life threat or assassination to plaintiff as occurred several times before, and on 11/29/07 after the hearing of Nov 28, 2007 when judge dismissed defendants. Feb 6, 2008 another attempt of attack directly at the door of Plaintiff residence. A Complex Matter with ONE Plaintiff In Pro Per is very frustrating, needs attention and justice of the court.
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Case No.: No. BC354160
DAMAGES & COURT INJUSTICE
No reply from defendants or judge
Lawmakers to reply
Plaintiff (PL) returns back 2 mails dated May 7, 9, 2008 received 5/12/08 from Defendant (Def) Caltrans Legal Division during PL waiting for a new judge to be assigned. Exh “A”, “B”
PL will NOT return back 1” thick mail received from D1. It is from Caltrans Legal Div. dated 3/24/08 that PL deposited in the court on March 2008 due to judge is recused for discrimination acts, PL received this mail back on 5/12/08 from court D1 in damaged condition enclosed in another envelope along with 3-page minutes from J. Lee Edmon. Exh C
Minutes addressed returning back 1” thick mail postage paid & denying request of PL for a hearing before J. Lee reg. J. Helen abuse to PL & to the matter. PL is disappointed from court’s negative action. This is illegal and is disputed by PL In Pro Per who reserves her right against any future harm or losses that D1 shall be liable of along with J. Helen Bendix.
JUDGE ..(Def)….: Hon Judge Helen Bendix ACTION FILED : June 16, 2006
TRIAL DATE : June 18, 2008 to vacate &move
TIME : 9:30 a.m. to vacate &move
HEARING DATE: reply by mail
|
TO ALL PARTIES, 39 DEFENDANTS, AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff (PL) is hereby returning mails closed as is, received on May 12, 2008 from Caltrans Legal Division, for the following reasons: Legal office is Defendant (Def) representing Defendants, Judge recused and is a Def due to discrimination, humiliating Plaintiff in public, conspiring with defendants, harassment and threat in court, falsifying court documents.
While Plaintiff is waiting since 2/7/08 to 5/12/08 for reply from supervising judge, Lee Edmon, reg. discrimination complaint filed by Plaintiff against judge Helen and requesting assignment of new judge, 1) case is delayed, and 2) judge Helen and Defendants are conducting hearings and sending mails and frivolous rulings on the name of plaintiff and abusing my time and court records and causing unnecessary expenses and debts!! Who is liable of this chaos? Therefore, whoever decides or rules shall pay for the consequences of his/her decision, and for further losses, expenses and compensation.
Appeals courts are defendants and are not allowed to hear this matter by either party. Any further steps needed in outside the State courts, J. Helen & supervising judge shall pay for it. If Plaintiff had known of this court corruption, Plaintiff would not have used this abusive court system, but now Lawmakers shall do something about it in order to properly litigate this legal matter; shall clean up the mess occurred since 1994, and cluttering name of PL statewide and worldwide. PL opened this court to seek justice NOT to get harassed, but she is treated like stupid for no system existed but gamesmanship & lies. This is corruption and insult to the humanity and civilization.
Mails are listed below, closed as is:
1. Small yellow envelope dated May 7, 2008. Exh “A”
2. Small yellow envelope dated May 9, 2008. Exh “B”
3. Large Yellow envelope 1” thick dated Mar 24, 2008 in damaged condition and taped all around, enclosed in another envelope dated May 2, 2008 received by PL on May 12, 2008. Is kept with media for demonstration. Exh “C”
No activity in court shall be accepted during investigation, PL medical treatment, and assigning new judge. Plaintiff is not to be taken as stupid for attorneys and judges to play games and politics harassing In Pro Per while laws & courts are lacking respect and system, for In Pro Per.
It is very disrespectful, insult, illegal, and promoting immoral for the Court and judges to keep the court running in hassle and nonsense and lies, in harassment and intimidation and coercing Plaintiff; to side defendants without hearing PL but rather falsify court documents; to allow unequal representation between parties in court and call it laws and system; to cover up on offense and corruption in governmental agencies misusing their power and immunity; and to close women’s legal matters with no compensation and equal justice. It is intolerable, offensive, and denied.
Plaintiff is the owner of the matter and has to be heard completely. Defendants and Judge Helen as a Defendant are not allowed to contact Plaintiff and conduct hearing to rule for Plaintiff it is conflict of interest and felony for the court to assume and keep this nonsense system and corruption putting people under duress and object them to crime.
Judge Edmon, Supervising Judge, Dept 1, is liable to ensure justice and fairness to all parties NOT to favor to a judge for prestigious reason (a woman engineer acquires same high quality prestige as well) or for economic reason (judge Helen is liable) None of Plaintiff business if a judge disturbed the funding of the matter. Plaintiff had warned the judge repetitively to stop wasting time and delaying the matter since January 2007 and causing nonsense unreasonable debts to Plaintiff In Pro Per. Court and judges have no authority to muddle with or clutter a woman engineer excellent accomplishment, life, and career.
If supervising Judge decides to keep J. Helen (defendant) to conduct hearing and trial to her Plaintiff, ignoring conflict of interest & discrimination, it would be top corruption in the court and is an issue to be discussed on the media to question validity of the constitution, the laws & judges’ qualification in repetitively ruling unjust and nonsense. If any appeal claimed, supervising judge and J. Helen shall pay for their decision and actions!!! Plaintiff did not cause problems and there is no law for In Pro Per either to ensure justice.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
DATED: May 18, 2008 ________________________
Monique S. Sidaross, Eng
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
Exh "A", Exh "B", Exh "C" are pictures of the closed envelopes and could not be pasted here due to font reason. They are letters from Caltrans Legal Division and Plaintiff has no idea what is inside. The main concern of Plaintiff is that Defendants are not supposed to contact the judge or the Plaintiff while judge is defendant due to discrimination and humiliation in public in court; Plaintiff requested hearing before Judge Edmon supervising judge to question J. Helen's discrimination. Plaintiff requests have to be respected equally to defendants otherwise, court system shall be closed if Judges shall play games with defendants alone stepping on Plaintiff In Pro Per Right and justice and adopt impartiality!! This is a crime and violation to the constitution. No activity shall take place until a new judge is assigned and until Lawmakers and House Represntatives contact Plaintiff.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NEW DETAILS WILL BE POSTED SOON
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NEW DETAILS WILL BE POSTED SOON